Teachers play a vital role in the overall well being of any society. They are responsible for the education of the next generation of leaders. Yet teachers are forced to work under great pressure. They not only teach but they also have many administrative responsibilities. In addition, they are expected to be involved with extra curricular activities. There is simply no time for professional development. Thankfully, since the inception of instructional rounds teachers are given the opportunity to grow and learn.
The good thing about this system is that it is easy to implement and to manage. All that happens is that a few teachers get together to visit a teaching session of a colleague. It is a voluntary system and even the observed teacher has to agree to such an observation session. The whole idea behind the system is to observe more experienced teachers and to learn from the way that he teaches.
The observers meet before the visit in order to formulate specific objectives for the observation session. These objectives normally focus on the known strong points of the observed colleague. He may, for example, have a reputation for enhancing his lesson with the effective use of multimedia, or he may be very successful in maintaining discipline in the classroom. The observers aim to find out how he does it.
Observers never evaluate the colleague that is observed. That will negate the entire idea behind these sessions. They have only one goal and that is to learn from the observed colleague. This is why the learners are informed about the reason for the visit and that is also why no feedback is ever given. The observers do not participate in the classroom activities and they do not interact with learners.
Directly after the observation session the observers have another meeting. They compare notes but their discussions always focus on what it was that the learned. They are not permitted to criticise at all. They also debate ways in which they can improve their own classroom performances based on what they learned during the observation session. All their discussions are confidential and they do not submit a report.
The popularity of this system has soared. It is easy to plan and to implement and teachers are keen to participate. These sessions allow them to get to know their colleagues a little better and they are given the opportunity to develop professionally. Many participants have professed that they have learned much during these sessions and that their own results have improved as a consequence. The benefits of the system are enjoyed by all the role players in education.
Critics say that the system is superficial. Observers do not spend enough time in the classrooms of observed professionals. They also say that observed teachers do not behave or teach in the way they normally do because they want to impress the observers. Supporters strongly deny this and are in favour of having the system implemented at every school.
Improving the educational system, even in very small ways, should always be a priority. Teachers should be given every possible opportunity to improve their skills. Their charges are, after all, the future leaders of the world.
The good thing about this system is that it is easy to implement and to manage. All that happens is that a few teachers get together to visit a teaching session of a colleague. It is a voluntary system and even the observed teacher has to agree to such an observation session. The whole idea behind the system is to observe more experienced teachers and to learn from the way that he teaches.
The observers meet before the visit in order to formulate specific objectives for the observation session. These objectives normally focus on the known strong points of the observed colleague. He may, for example, have a reputation for enhancing his lesson with the effective use of multimedia, or he may be very successful in maintaining discipline in the classroom. The observers aim to find out how he does it.
Observers never evaluate the colleague that is observed. That will negate the entire idea behind these sessions. They have only one goal and that is to learn from the observed colleague. This is why the learners are informed about the reason for the visit and that is also why no feedback is ever given. The observers do not participate in the classroom activities and they do not interact with learners.
Directly after the observation session the observers have another meeting. They compare notes but their discussions always focus on what it was that the learned. They are not permitted to criticise at all. They also debate ways in which they can improve their own classroom performances based on what they learned during the observation session. All their discussions are confidential and they do not submit a report.
The popularity of this system has soared. It is easy to plan and to implement and teachers are keen to participate. These sessions allow them to get to know their colleagues a little better and they are given the opportunity to develop professionally. Many participants have professed that they have learned much during these sessions and that their own results have improved as a consequence. The benefits of the system are enjoyed by all the role players in education.
Critics say that the system is superficial. Observers do not spend enough time in the classrooms of observed professionals. They also say that observed teachers do not behave or teach in the way they normally do because they want to impress the observers. Supporters strongly deny this and are in favour of having the system implemented at every school.
Improving the educational system, even in very small ways, should always be a priority. Teachers should be given every possible opportunity to improve their skills. Their charges are, after all, the future leaders of the world.
About the Author:
When you are searching for information about instructional rounds, come to our web pages online today. More details are available at http://www.instructionalrounds.com/WhatIsIR.html now.








0 commentaires:
Post a Comment